Back to Transactions of RHASS Volume 1940 Transactions

Transactions of RHASS Volume 1940 - Page 026

Image details

Year 1940
Transcription
OCR Text 40 THE CONTROL OF PESTS 0F FARM AND GARDEN CROPS.
METHODS or APPLYING INSECTICIDES AND FUNGICIDES.
Pest control chemicals may be applied by three methods,
as follows :—
(1) Spraying, where the material is applied as a solution
or as a suspension or an emulsion in water.
(2) Dusting, where the material is applied as a finely divided
powder.
(3) Fumigation, when the chemical is applied as a gas or
vapour.
Of these three methods the one that finds the widest applica-
tion is spraying. In spraying, great care must be taken to
select materials of a quality and kind Suitable for the purpose
in view. In this country there are not at present any legal
standards for poisons to be used as sprays. An arsenical
spray of unsuitable quality, for instance, may injure the
foliage of the plant as much as it does the pest. Then the
application must be made at the proper time. The essential
requirements of a spray are (1) the material must not damage
the plant, (2) the spray must cover the whole surface upon
which it is to act. A contact spray must make contact with
the pest to be killed, while a protective spray must cover
the whole of the surface it is to protect. Where the poison
is to act as a stomach insecticide it must remain on the plant
surface sufficiently long to poison the pest. If it is washed
off by rain, or if chemical decomposition takes place, then
its efficiency is reduced. Care must be exercised, therefore,
to see that the materials made are suitable for the purpose
in view. There have been many cases where costly spray
materials have been wasted and where the protection of the
crop has been inefficient through neglect of this precaution.
Many water solutions fail to cover the surface of a plant
because the solution does not wet it, and when applied merely
runs off again more or less completely. Other solutions,
although they wet the surface, collect in large droplets upon
the leaf surface, and, on drying, we get an uneven deposit
of the poison which may harm the leaf at those parts where
it is concentrated. Many of the early sprays suffered from
these defects, and the discovery of means of improving the
wetting power of Sprays has been among the most valuable
of recent improvements in the means of making sprays
efieetive. To overcome wetting difficulties, substances known
as wetters and spreaders are incorporated in the sprays. A
wetter makes the Spray wet the foliage, and a spreader makes
it spread in a uniform film over the leaf. Many substances
act as both wetters and spreaders. Where protection is
desired to last for some time substances which make the
THE CONTROL or rnsrs OF FARM AND GARDEN CROPS. 41
spray adhere to the leaf are mixed in the spray, and these
substances are known as stickers.
Wetters.—The first wetter and spreader used was soap, by
Robertson in 1821, who used it for a sulphur spray. Soft
soap has been widely used, but it has the great disadvantage
that it is not suitable for use with hard water. Also it cannot
be used in sprays which contain lime. Where lime is present
casein or skim milk has been found to act as a good wetter.
Recently a Substance named sodium hexa-meta-phosphate
has become available in commercial quantities, and this
material at the rate of 3} lb. to 100 gallons of water allows
ordinary soaps to be used with ordinary hard waters. During
the last few years a large number of organic soaps have been
found to possess high wetting powers. Most of these sub-
stances are proprietary articles sold by the makers under
trade names such, for example, as Agral I. and Agral N.,
and Aresket and Areskap. The use of such substances is
well worth while, for their wetting power may be as much
as ten times greater than that of ordinary soap.
Although the incorporation of a little wetter and spreader
may increase the efficiency of a spray, one has to be careful
not to add too much. If this is done it may increase the
spreading properties so much that it will cause most of the
spray to run off. For greatest efficiency a correct balance
must be made to allow the surface to be properly wet, and
at the same time a sufficient amount of spray to be retained
upon the surface of the plant.
When the poison to be applied is in the form of a solid
which is not soluble in water, then a suspension must be made.
Sometimes a substance, such as sulphur, will not mix readily
with water. In Such a case mixing may easily be accomplished
by including a little of a suitable wetter with the solid. For
example, when only 1% ounces of butyl-phenyl-phenol-sodium-
sulphonate—a proprietary article known as Aresket—is mixed
with 100 lb. of precipitated sulphur, the sulphur mixes with
water at once.
If the spray contains an oil which does not mix with water,
then it must be emulsified. It was difficult at one time to
make a good emulsion, but now there are a number of sub-
stances upon the market which when dissolved in the oil
emulsify it immediately on mixing with water. A great deal
of attention has been paid to emulsions recently, and some
of the most efiicient pest control substances are what are
termed quick-breaking emulsions. A quick-breaking emulsion
Is one which breaks up on being sprayed upon the plant and
deposms a film of oil containing the poison on the surface.
This film of oil is not readily washed off by rain, and so pro-
longed protection is obtained.
Muted Sprays.—Sometimes it is advisable to mix two or







































Title Transactions of RHASS Volume 1940 - Page 026